We facilitate the movement of capital across India, the UAE, and Singapore, advising on structure, jurisdiction, and execution for situations where a single-market approach is insufficient.
India attracts significant interest from offshore investors: family offices, private credit funds, and institutional capital looking for yield, exposure, and long-term positioning. The challenge is rarely access. It is structure.
Inbound capital into India sits across multiple regulatory frameworks including FDI policy, FEMA, RBI guidelines, and sector-specific restrictions. A structure that works commercially must also hold legally, tax-efficiently, and operationally across both jurisdictions simultaneously.
We advise on the architecture of inbound investments, covering the right entry vehicle, the right instrument, and the sequencing that allows capital to move, be deployed, and eventually be repatriated without friction created at the point of entry.
Indian promoters and businesses increasingly require capital structures that extend beyond domestic frameworks, whether for overseas expansion, offshore holding structures, or access to capital pools that are not available within India.
The UAE and Singapore serve distinct but complementary functions in this context. The UAE offers proximity to Gulf capital and a regulatory environment suited to holding and investment activity. Singapore provides access to Southeast Asian capital, a mature financial infrastructure, and established frameworks for structured capital activity.
We advise on structures that allow Indian businesses to access these environments correctly, not just legally, but commercially and operationally.
Where a transaction is domiciled affects not just its legal form but its commercial viability: the cost of capital, the investor universe available, the regulatory obligations that follow, and the optionality that remains after close.
We operate across three jurisdictions with sufficient depth to advise on these questions, not as a compliance exercise, but as a structural one. The choice of jurisdiction is a capital decision, not an administrative one.
With the structural question, not the capital question. Which jurisdiction does the business operate in? Which jurisdiction does the capital come from? Where does the risk sit? Where does the return need to land? What regulatory constraints apply on each side?
These questions determine the structure. The structure determines which capital is appropriate. The capital question comes last.
Understanding the jurisdiction, instrument, and regulatory context before any capital conversation begins.
Identifying the relevant pools of capital across jurisdictions, matched to the structure, not the other way around.
Designing the instrument, the vehicle, and the sequencing across regulatory, tax, and commercial considerations simultaneously.
From structuring through to close. Involvement does not end at the term sheet. Continuity is part of what makes complex mandates work.
Cross-border capital situations require advisors who understand both sides of the transaction, not just where the capital originates or where it lands, but what holds the structure together across the distance.
We work on a selective, mandate-based basis. Most engagements are referral-led. A single conversation is usually sufficient to establish whether there is alignment.
Request a confidential discussion →